205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.15%
Revenue growth above 1.5x INTC's 5.19%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
8.67%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of INTC's 11.28%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
-18.95%
Negative EBIT growth while INTC is at 18.65%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-14.93%
Negative operating income growth while INTC is at 18.65%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-47.61%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-48.68%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-47.22%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.47%
Share count expansion well above INTC's 0.13%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-4.07%
Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 0.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
2.45%
Dividend growth under 50% of INTC's 34.82%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
-23.75%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-222.99%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
42.96%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 635.46%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-19.24%
Negative 5Y CAGR while INTC stands at 121.57%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
13.52%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 38.07%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
2418.16%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 666.08%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-16.24%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is at 381.60%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-19.88%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC stands at 22.16%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
7472.52%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 1144.73% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
105.66%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 185.26%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
-64.38%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC is 55.16%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
287.85%
Below 50% of INTC's 837.05%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
182.94%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 258.71%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
76.79%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to INTC's 84.00%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
15.66%
Dividend/share CAGR of 15.66% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
-4.26%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while INTC stands at 333.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-1.77%
Negative near-term dividend growth while INTC invests at 168.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
12.58%
AR growth well above INTC's 5.56%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
10.11%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. INTC's 20.47%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-6.23%
Negative asset growth while INTC invests at 1.02%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-2.27%
We have a declining book value while INTC shows 2.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
4.89%
We have some new debt while INTC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
33.25%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 0.62%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
13.25%
SG&A growth well above INTC's 8.01%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.