PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.30%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-4.22%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
15.97%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
15.09%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-6.77%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-2.56%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-2.63%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.73%
Share count expansion well above INTC's 0.15%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
17.08%
Slight or no buyback while INTC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
4.95%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while INTC cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
34.22%
OCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 12.15%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
-197.20%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
29.76%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 608.38%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-26.65%
Negative 5Y CAGR while INTC stands at 103.31%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
12.01%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 41.83%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
-2.10%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC stands at 1037.89%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
7.60%
Below 50% of INTC's 100.14%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
24.27%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 3.09%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
953.20%
Similar net income/share CAGR to INTC's 1039.41%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
90.10%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 170.66%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
299.75%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 33.43%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
302.95%
Below 50% of INTC's 784.93%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
168.64%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 228.96%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
91.42%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 105.13%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
21.42%
Dividend/share CAGR of 21.42% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
-2.02%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while INTC stands at 337.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-2.13%
Negative near-term dividend growth while INTC invests at 192.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-6.69%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
9.89%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 15.75%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-3.38%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.45%
Positive BV/share change while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-3.74%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 14.69%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-17.26%
Our R&D shrinks while INTC invests at 2.15%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-11.48%
We cut SG&A while INTC invests at 7.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.