PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.35%
Negative revenue growth while INTC stands at 6.69%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-2.35%
Negative gross profit growth while INTC is at 19.69%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-9.39%
Negative EBIT growth while INTC is at 159.13%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-9.39%
Negative operating income growth while INTC is at 159.13%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
0.85%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 375.47%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
-3.57%
Negative EPS growth while INTC is at 250.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-3.57%
Negative diluted EPS growth while INTC is at 250.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-4.27%
Share reduction while INTC is at 1.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-4.27%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
1.64%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while INTC cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
133.53%
OCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 60.03%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
2372.73%
FCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 211.10%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-12.84%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while INTC stands at 468.43%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
44.05%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 20.90%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
27.18%
Positive 3Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
90.99%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 700.87%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
16.19%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 12.80%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
160.94%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-16.62%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is at 162.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-293.74%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-187.06%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
419.26%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 695.79%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
175.56%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 136.79%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
158.15%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 57.39%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
28.19%
Dividend/share CAGR of 28.19% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
6.92%
Below 50% of INTC's 264.42%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
54.74%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 105.37%. Martin Whitman might see a weaker short-term approach to distributing cash.
-17.32%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-16.56%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
3.51%
Asset growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.37%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
7.46%
Positive BV/share change while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-1.19%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 14.52%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
6.70%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 2.37%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-3.53%
We cut SG&A while INTC invests at 0.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.