PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
18.34%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
40.10%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
452.27%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
452.27%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
350.00%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
350.00%
Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
350.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.11%
Dividend growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.10%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
30.74%
OCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 10.54%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
19.32%
FCF growth under 50% of INTC's 485.71%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
-23.21%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while INTC stands at 282.22%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-31.88%
Negative 5Y CAGR while INTC stands at 3.85%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-23.85%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
92.96%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 315.87%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-48.34%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
5.65%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 16.13%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-12.50%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is at 66.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-69.24%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-75.71%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
285.89%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 504.22%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
105.52%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with INTC's 100.22%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
42.79%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 38.49%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
15.92%
Dividend/share CAGR of 15.92% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
6.77%
Below 50% of INTC's 220.12%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
8.43%
Below 50% of INTC's 32.86%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
22.90%
AR growth well above INTC's 0.83%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
6.77%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 1.01%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-3.53%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-3.98%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.12%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 4.28%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
11.32%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.