PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.98%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 2.93%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
-2.45%
Negative gross profit growth while INTC is at 6.87%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-29.68%
Negative EBIT growth while INTC is at 50.86%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-29.68%
Negative operating income growth while INTC is at 50.86%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
97.89%
Net income growth above 1.5x INTC's 53.81%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
120.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x INTC's 42.86%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
120.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x INTC's 42.86%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-10.05%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-10.05%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-7.61%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
45.99%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 41.56%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
40.95%
FCF growth under 50% of INTC's 150.17%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
-16.58%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while INTC stands at 313.08%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-18.69%
Negative 5Y CAGR while INTC stands at 3.98%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-7.31%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
28.80%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 694.78%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-6.59%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
4.84%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
131.58%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 158.05%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
-90.07%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-54.01%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
290.57%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 529.91%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
58.71%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 74.19%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
37.68%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 21.06%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
10.87%
Dividend/share CAGR of 10.87% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
2.63%
Below 50% of INTC's 167.10%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
8.23%
Below 50% of INTC's 34.42%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
-2.08%
Firm’s AR is declining while INTC shows 6.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
0.37%
We show growth while INTC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-0.60%
Negative asset growth while INTC invests at 0.32%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
8.39%
Positive BV/share change while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
0.24%
We have some new debt while INTC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
2.72%
We increase R&D while INTC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
4.75%
SG&A growth well above INTC's 3.01%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.