PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.54%
Negative revenue growth while INTC stands at 10.09%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-7.90%
Negative gross profit growth while INTC is at 16.48%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-38.53%
Negative EBIT growth while INTC is at 51.87%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-38.53%
Negative operating income growth while INTC is at 51.87%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-413.30%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 52.92%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-427.27%
Negative EPS growth while INTC is at 60.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-427.27%
Negative diluted EPS growth while INTC is at 60.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-4.63%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-4.63%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
3.93%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while INTC cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
31.68%
OCF growth at 50-75% of INTC's 47.26%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
71.62%
FCF growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 61.42%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capex decisions or cost controls create a cash flow advantage.
-5.13%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while INTC stands at 251.88%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-15.47%
Negative 5Y CAGR while INTC stands at 19.03%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-15.91%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
85.67%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 314.05%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
50.12%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 9.60%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-19.16%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC stands at 4.02%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-771.93%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is at 123.40%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-97.66%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-236.55%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
384.28%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 494.46%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
73.59%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 98.84%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
22.61%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 10.30%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
31.76%
Dividend/share CAGR of 31.76% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
1.27%
Below 50% of INTC's 191.40%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
11.94%
Below 50% of INTC's 33.56%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
-19.03%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-4.01%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-1.48%
Negative asset growth while INTC invests at 1.35%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
1.47%
1.25-1.5x INTC's 1.20%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.72%
Our R&D shrinks while INTC invests at 1.59%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-6.80%
We cut SG&A while INTC invests at 0.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.