PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.14%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
12.09%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
128.36%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
128.36%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
119.86%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
119.44%
Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
119.44%
Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
2.54%
Slight or no buybacks while INTC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
2.54%
Slight or no buyback while INTC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
0.23%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while INTC cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-73.66%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-87.40%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
1.63%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 260.69%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-6.45%
Negative 5Y CAGR while INTC stands at 12.60%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-22.48%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
64.62%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 247.77%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
506.54%
Positive OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-52.39%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
26.17%
Below 50% of INTC's 80.55%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
892.78%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-72.86%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
363.72%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 500.03%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
67.55%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with INTC's 64.16%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
-6.45%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
46.91%
Below 50% of INTC's 574.43%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
4.65%
Below 50% of INTC's 167.59%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
3.23%
Below 50% of INTC's 33.52%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
12.16%
AR growth well above INTC's 15.15%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
11.65%
We show growth while INTC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-1.93%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-2.52%
We have a declining book value while INTC shows 0.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-20.32%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-0.97%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
4.51%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.