PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.71%
Revenue growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.96%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
1.74%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-18.30%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-18.30%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
3.42%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.42%
Slight or no buybacks while INTC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
3.42%
Slight or no buyback while INTC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-3.31%
Dividend reduction while INTC stands at 0.48%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
92.86%
OCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 54.91%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
237.50%
FCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 128.31%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-16.43%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while INTC stands at 244.54%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-2.34%
Negative 5Y CAGR while INTC stands at 19.21%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-18.48%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
23.60%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 311.25%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
10.68%
Below 50% of INTC's 579.71%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-41.48%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-18.75%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is at 69.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
110.54%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-90.75%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
285.08%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 496.62%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
66.14%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with INTC's 69.28%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
-14.43%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
15.94%
Below 50% of INTC's 577.97%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
1.45%
Below 50% of INTC's 166.27%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
7.83%
Below 50% of INTC's 34.71%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
5.49%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
13.38%
We show growth while INTC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
1.66%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 1.50%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
-1.39%
We have a declining book value while INTC shows 0.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-12.30%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 6.30%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
3.92%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 0.98%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
8.97%
SG&A growth well above INTC's 5.99%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.