PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.36%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of INTC's 11.59%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
15.92%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of INTC's 21.90%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
75.90%
EBIT growth above 1.5x INTC's 11.20%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
75.90%
Operating income growth above 1.5x INTC's 11.20%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
14.77%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 31.14%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
-15.38%
Negative EPS growth while INTC is at 32.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-16.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while INTC is at 28.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
50.74%
Slight or no buybacks while INTC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
51.98%
Diluted share count expanding well above INTC's 0.69%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-35.45%
Dividend reduction while INTC stands at 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
109.22%
OCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 24.47%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
186.64%
FCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 54.11%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-48.19%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while INTC stands at 264.84%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
21.71%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to INTC's 24.04%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
-38.73%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC stands at 3.79%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
36.94%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 351.15%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
120.38%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 14.94%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
8.97%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 21.38%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
71.28%
Below 50% of INTC's 264.71%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
137.70%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 13.75%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-45.79%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC is 2.39%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
127.57%
Below 50% of INTC's 403.17%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
59.18%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 74.92%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
-36.96%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while INTC is at 4.78%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-5.96%
Cut dividends over 10 years while INTC stands at 510.39%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-4.47%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while INTC stands at 111.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-34.92%
Negative near-term dividend growth while INTC invests at 0.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-4.66%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-1.11%
Inventory is declining while INTC stands at 13.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.81%
Asset growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.30%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-31.13%
We have a declining book value while INTC shows 1.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-0.48%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-4.27%
Our R&D shrinks while INTC invests at 3.70%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-1.60%
We cut SG&A while INTC invests at 8.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.