PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.99%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
10.72%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
8.22%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
8.22%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-28.46%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-4.55%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.13%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-34.35%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
53.69%
Dividend growth at 50-75% of INTC's 98.69%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in returning cash to shareholders.
-63.17%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-101.01%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
0.94%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 231.96%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
32.83%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 16.86%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
18.57%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 25.68%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
-19.88%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC stands at 217.53%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
67.07%
Positive OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
237.16%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 55.36%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
130.60%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 206.00%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
32.77%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
62.90%
Below 50% of INTC's 269.97%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
309.80%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 410.83%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
66.92%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 58.13%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
-5.11%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while INTC is at 7.07%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
83.26%
Below 50% of INTC's 1246.01%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
3.43%
Below 50% of INTC's 296.59%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
2.09%
Below 50% of INTC's 100.47%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
15.64%
AR growth well above INTC's 13.99%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
16.67%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 11.00%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
1.77%
Positive asset growth while INTC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
52.33%
BV/share growth above 1.5x INTC's 1.19%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-0.36%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 5.43%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
10.27%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 1.53%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
14.94%
SG&A growth well above INTC's 0.53%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.