PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.39%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
12.03%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
24.89%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
24.89%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
20.16%
Net income growth above 1.5x INTC's 1.56%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
19.05%
EPS growth of 19.05% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
19.05%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x INTC's 3.85%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
1.79%
Slight or no buybacks while INTC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-1.12%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-1.76%
Dividend reduction while INTC stands at 0.09%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
28.75%
OCF growth under 50% of INTC's 129.79%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
1975.00%
FCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 179.06%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
7.68%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 215.04%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
22.96%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to INTC's 22.48%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
61.53%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 32.51%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
45.01%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 485.29%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
48.79%
Below 50% of INTC's 189.37%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-12.33%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC stands at 100.05%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
99.88%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 197.65%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
21.43%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 3.12%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
327.27%
Below 50% of INTC's 834.79%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
287.62%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 402.43%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
68.15%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 55.53%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
-0.31%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while INTC is at 9.55%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
81.51%
Below 50% of INTC's 1232.02%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
-1.12%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while INTC stands at 164.84%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
1.53%
Below 50% of INTC's 99.29%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
15.02%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
11.93%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 15.27%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
1.68%
Asset growth well under 50% of INTC's 3.36%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.11%
50-75% of INTC's 1.75%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
-4.70%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
4.05%
We increase R&D while INTC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
5.93%
SG&A growth well above INTC's 2.54%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.