PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.98%
Negative revenue growth while INTC stands at 13.30%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-10.41%
Negative gross profit growth while INTC is at 13.94%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-26.33%
Negative EBIT growth while INTC is at 22.21%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-26.33%
Negative operating income growth while INTC is at 22.21%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-12.97%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 11.39%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-12.12%
Negative EPS growth while INTC is at 10.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-12.50%
Negative diluted EPS growth while INTC is at 10.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.35%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.65%
Dividend growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.87%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
38.54%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 29.81%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
78.76%
FCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 49.42%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-2.53%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while INTC stands at 227.99%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
16.81%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 23.93%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
63.75%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 49.61%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
160.39%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 301.70%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
34.06%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 27.40%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
55.27%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 35.94%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
124.14%
Below 50% of INTC's 529.54%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
7.41%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to INTC's 6.79%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
492.03%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 358.50%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
269.66%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 359.23%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
41.08%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 25.73%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
2.06%
Below 50% of INTC's 17.20%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
64.52%
Below 50% of INTC's 1011.92%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
29.35%
Below 50% of INTC's 167.21%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
13.43%
Below 50% of INTC's 104.70%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
-13.69%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-7.37%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
1.00%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 0.72%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
1.65%
50-75% of INTC's 2.29%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
-1.04%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
1.04%
R&D dropping or stable vs. INTC's 2.62%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
3.72%
SG&A declining or stable vs. INTC's 9.08%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.