PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.74%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
0.15%
Gross profit growth under 50% of INTC's 4.11%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-20.25%
Negative EBIT growth while INTC is at 4.55%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
2.69%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of INTC's 4.55%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
-16.12%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 2.59%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-17.24%
Negative EPS growth while INTC is at 6.06%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-14.29%
Negative diluted EPS growth while INTC is at 6.06%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-1.33%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.36%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.95%
Dividend reduction while INTC stands at 99.89%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-59.92%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-77.51%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-9.32%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while INTC stands at 197.89%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
3.28%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 26.98%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
81.70%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 49.72%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
96.01%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 456.55%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
24.83%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to INTC's 23.16%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
97.36%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 164.53%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
56.05%
Below 50% of INTC's 175.17%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-6.33%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
1308.11%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 150.41%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
217.61%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 323.26%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
1.99%
Below 50% of INTC's 12.37%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
12.23%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to INTC's 13.17%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
63.26%
Below 50% of INTC's 2132.86%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
17.88%
Below 50% of INTC's 434.69%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
29.81%
Below 50% of INTC's 299.14%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.88%
Inventory is declining while INTC stands at 7.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-7.69%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-7.64%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-1.58%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
1.43%
R&D dropping or stable vs. INTC's 4.28%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
-4.97%
We cut SG&A while INTC invests at 3.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.