PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.06%
Revenue growth under 50% of INTC's 2.42%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-2.03%
Negative gross profit growth while INTC is at 5.92%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
6.44%
EBIT growth similar to INTC's 6.74%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
6.44%
Operating income growth similar to INTC's 6.74%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
3.80%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 22.96%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
5.13%
EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 24.24%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
5.26%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 25.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-1.23%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.50%
Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
194294.01%
Dividend growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.09%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
-40.03%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-47.18%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-5.84%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while INTC stands at 166.96%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
28.37%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to INTC's 31.31%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
70.09%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 56.47%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
61.20%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 147.49%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
49.82%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 23.65%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
24.02%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 16.31%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
112.59%
Below 50% of INTC's 239.12%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
11.83%
Below 50% of INTC's 25.30%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
213.01%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 156.81%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
175.31%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 257.23%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
2.48%
Below 50% of INTC's 8.59%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
13.01%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to INTC's 12.03%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
37.38%
Below 50% of INTC's 1650.68%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
40.20%
Below 50% of INTC's 299.94%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
35.49%
Below 50% of INTC's 301.02%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
-13.94%
Firm’s AR is declining while INTC shows 4.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
9.93%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 11.05%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
0.53%
Asset growth well under 50% of INTC's 2.01%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.79%
Positive BV/share change while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
84.64%
Debt shrinking faster vs. INTC's 253.65%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
-5.12%
Our R&D shrinks while INTC invests at 1.57%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
4.17%
SG&A declining or stable vs. INTC's 8.66%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.