PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.89%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
14.06%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
32.73%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
32.73%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
308.03%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
316.22%
Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
316.67%
Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-2.02%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.98%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.07%
Dividend reduction while INTC stands at 0.40%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
14.72%
Positive OCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
77.85%
Positive FCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
50.46%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 112.25%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
109.30%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 46.59%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
75.93%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 32.17%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
278.11%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
25.75%
Positive OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
88.16%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
2966.45%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 4.11% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
1497.30%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 423.45%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
2095.75%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 11.10%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
191.78%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with INTC's 206.91%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
16.42%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 9.80%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
30.08%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 10.28%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
42.42%
Below 50% of INTC's 2059.78%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
46.49%
Below 50% of INTC's 399.78%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
41.39%
Below 50% of INTC's 399.72%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
7.29%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
7.14%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. INTC's 21.45%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
13.46%
Positive asset growth while INTC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
16.14%
BV/share growth above 1.5x INTC's 2.20%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-86.48%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 3.40%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
0.56%
We increase R&D while INTC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-0.71%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.