PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.73%
Revenue growth under 50% of INTC's 9.11%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
1.31%
Gross profit growth under 50% of INTC's 2.95%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-2.41%
Negative EBIT growth while INTC is at 28.17%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-2.41%
Negative operating income growth while INTC is at 28.17%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-70.59%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 47.01%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-69.48%
Negative EPS growth while INTC is at 53.33%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-69.33%
Negative diluted EPS growth while INTC is at 46.67%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-3.03%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-3.09%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.93%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while INTC cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-34.43%
Negative OCF growth while INTC is at 82.11%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-46.04%
Negative FCF growth while INTC is at 887.86%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
57.48%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 108.58%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
125.75%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 55.49%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
69.50%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 26.03%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
176.00%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 105.77%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
39.23%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 57.79%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
-6.21%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
581.29%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 21.70% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
765.91%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 1329.26%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
79.28%
Positive short-term CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
194.56%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with INTC's 187.19%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
15.59%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 13.58%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
20.14%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 5.88%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
40.48%
Below 50% of INTC's 1627.13%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
37.98%
Below 50% of INTC's 397.72%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
41.93%
Below 50% of INTC's 397.57%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
8.29%
AR growth well above INTC's 5.66%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
11.69%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 3.35%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-7.18%
Negative asset growth while INTC invests at 1.66%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-3.02%
We have a declining book value while INTC shows 1.19%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.34%
We increase R&D while INTC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
3.35%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.