PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.92%
Negative revenue growth while INTC stands at 10.93%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-9.52%
Negative gross profit growth while INTC is at 12.02%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-17.63%
Negative EBIT growth while INTC is at 8.30%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-17.63%
Negative operating income growth while INTC is at 8.30%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-4.84%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 15.37%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-2.13%
Negative EPS growth while INTC is at 13.04%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.52%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-2.41%
Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 0.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
29.35%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while INTC cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
101.67%
OCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 50.61%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
341.26%
FCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 90.14%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
204.26%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 99.52%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
111.21%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 65.03%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
120.70%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 25.29%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
37.20%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 71.00%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
18.07%
Below 50% of INTC's 51.60%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
39.81%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 19.64%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
2571.27%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 4.16% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
727.64%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 254.03%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
129.87%
Positive short-term CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
187.22%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with INTC's 188.72%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
4.23%
Below 50% of INTC's 21.93%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
69.04%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 9.71%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
87.75%
Below 50% of INTC's 1762.12%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
75.60%
Below 50% of INTC's 410.99%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
184.42%
Below 50% of INTC's 396.75%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
-15.08%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-3.62%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-5.78%
Negative asset growth while INTC invests at 3.23%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-3.10%
We have a declining book value while INTC shows 5.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.46%
Our R&D shrinks while INTC invests at 2.66%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-1.39%
We cut SG&A while INTC invests at 0.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.