PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.85%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-6.35%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-11.23%
Negative EBIT growth while INTC is at 12.57%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-11.23%
Negative operating income growth while INTC is at 12.57%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-22.75%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 8.99%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-21.74%
Negative EPS growth while INTC is at 7.69%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-23.91%
Negative diluted EPS growth while INTC is at 7.69%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-1.77%
Share reduction while INTC is at 0.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-2.00%
Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 0.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
1.80%
Dividend growth under 50% of INTC's 12.59%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
-34.44%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-40.57%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
49.18%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 55.70%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
130.13%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 51.04%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
30.62%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 22.72%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
101.41%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
146.61%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 17.52%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
69.41%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
323.19%
Positive 10Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
1889.18%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 102.23%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
68.97%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 6.07%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
181.93%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 148.77%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
25.48%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 21.08%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
12.20%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 10.45%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
91.76%
Below 50% of INTC's 1698.05%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
106.54%
Below 50% of INTC's 461.23%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
88.39%
Below 50% of INTC's 181.51%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
-1.01%
Firm’s AR is declining while INTC shows 2.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-1.95%
Inventory is declining while INTC stands at 1.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-1.29%
Negative asset growth while INTC invests at 0.80%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
1.11%
50-75% of INTC's 1.88%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.72%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-4.93%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.