PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.30%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
8.98%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
18.97%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
18.97%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
18.22%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
16.67%
Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
20.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.35%
Share reduction while INTC is at 0.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.07%
Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 0.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
98.97%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while INTC cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
62.09%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 55.73%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
93.07%
FCF growth under 50% of INTC's 496.34%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
42.64%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 63.96%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
109.40%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 57.89%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
29.69%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 19.72%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
58.50%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 42.39%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
206.80%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 64.49%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
117.86%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
161.17%
Positive 10Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
748.99%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 229.36%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
69.80%
Positive short-term CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
174.56%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 156.77%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
33.59%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 28.25%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
13.44%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to INTC's 14.20%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
271.51%
Below 50% of INTC's 1690.36%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
247.95%
5Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 459.27%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging policy in mid-term shareholder returns.
281.54%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 180.56%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
8.03%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
1.06%
We show growth while INTC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
1.96%
Asset growth at 50-75% of INTC's 3.15%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
2.22%
Under 50% of INTC's 5.21%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-100.00%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 4.13%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-0.18%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
4.69%
SG&A growth well above INTC's 0.55%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.