PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.99%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-8.87%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-18.98%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-18.98%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-12.32%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-9.09%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-9.26%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-3.28%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-3.79%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.35%
Dividend reduction while INTC stands at 13.17%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-54.95%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-66.02%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
75.89%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to INTC's 82.78%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
88.01%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 62.32%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
41.12%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 10.05%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
1774.64%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 21.39%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
311.93%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 46.74%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
57.10%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
6975.22%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 28.53% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
612.67%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 78.66%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
106.47%
Positive short-term CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
93.88%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 113.60%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
15.72%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 30.12%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
6.14%
Below 50% of INTC's 15.72%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
373.82%
Below 50% of INTC's 1610.14%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
352.76%
5Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 539.08%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging policy in mid-term shareholder returns.
296.48%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 59.59%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-4.19%
Firm’s AR is declining while INTC shows 5.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
11.28%
We show growth while INTC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-2.60%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
2.17%
Positive BV/share change while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.98%
We increase R&D while INTC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
3.08%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.