PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.41%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-0.40%
Negative gross profit growth while INTC is at 0.81%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
3.22%
EBIT growth below 50% of INTC's 9.36%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
3.22%
Operating income growth under 50% of INTC's 9.36%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-11.18%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 10.95%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-10.00%
Negative EPS growth while INTC is at 12.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-10.20%
Negative diluted EPS growth while INTC is at 12.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.53%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.52%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.23%
Dividend reduction while INTC stands at 9.93%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-19.03%
Negative OCF growth while INTC is at 27.67%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-41.00%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
83.22%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to INTC's 89.64%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
87.61%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 59.08%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
27.99%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 10.60%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
99.01%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 730.81%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
79.80%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 22.23%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-22.36%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC stands at 2.58%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
1239.80%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 62.13% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
536.36%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 104.58%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
15.83%
Positive short-term CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
98.52%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 120.42%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
19.49%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 30.21%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
7.75%
Below 50% of INTC's 15.68%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
373.94%
Below 50% of INTC's 1761.76%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
367.18%
5Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 599.20%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging policy in mid-term shareholder returns.
298.29%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 74.94%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
8.51%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
4.63%
We show growth while INTC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
0.36%
Positive asset growth while INTC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.83%
BV/share growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.80%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.06%
Our R&D shrinks while INTC invests at 0.07%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-1.61%
We cut SG&A while INTC invests at 6.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.