PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.07%
Revenue growth under 50% of INTC's 7.89%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-6.06%
Negative gross profit growth while INTC is at 14.67%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-10.44%
Negative EBIT growth while INTC is at 37.38%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-10.44%
Negative operating income growth while INTC is at 37.38%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-4.25%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 25.80%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-4.44%
Negative EPS growth while INTC is at 28.57%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-2.27%
Negative diluted EPS growth while INTC is at 25.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-1.21%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.72%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.46%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while INTC cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
102.70%
OCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 16.23%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
243.37%
FCF growth under 50% of INTC's 822.79%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
91.91%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 81.78%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
76.29%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 51.71%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
17.50%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 10.98%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
123.71%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 31.74%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
171.96%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 19.92%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-13.46%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
311.00%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 54.71% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
66.06%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 41.37%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
11.12%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 9.22%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
100.48%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 113.77%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
16.45%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 21.14%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
5.88%
Below 50% of INTC's 14.79%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
361.29%
Below 50% of INTC's 1775.40%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
366.79%
5Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 595.21%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging policy in mid-term shareholder returns.
652488.96%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 74.31%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-2.04%
Firm’s AR is declining while INTC shows 14.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-4.60%
Inventory is declining while INTC stands at 4.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
0.68%
Similar asset growth to INTC's 0.62%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
2.34%
Positive BV/share change while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.89%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 0.20%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-8.88%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.