PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-26.45%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-33.23%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-87.40%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-93.30%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-80.99%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-79.07%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-79.07%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-1.76%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-2.28%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
9.57%
Dividend growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.06%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
6.27%
Positive OCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
21.75%
Positive FCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
121.43%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 36.62%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
81.93%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 10.14%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
-13.17%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
367.14%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
111.98%
Positive OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
54.17%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
0.30%
Positive 10Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-57.80%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-79.55%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
153.14%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 111.44%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
59.03%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 20.88%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-2.17%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while INTC is at 16.63%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
656.97%
Below 50% of INTC's 1368.40%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
692.36%
5Y dividend/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 595.08%. Bruce Berkowitz verifies that high dividend hikes remain sustainable, not a sign of over-distribution.
267.82%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 74.26%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-48.53%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-12.70%
Inventory is declining while INTC stands at 10.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-4.36%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-5.95%
We have a declining book value while INTC shows 1.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.99%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-7.18%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.