PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-16.26%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-26.53%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
22.34%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-80.00%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-84.11%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 176.50%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-88.89%
Negative EPS growth while INTC is at 200.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-88.89%
Negative diluted EPS growth while INTC is at 175.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.47%
Share reduction while INTC is at 0.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.62%
Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 0.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.47%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while INTC cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-77.55%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-80.02%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
28.28%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 19.99%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
-3.43%
Negative 5Y CAGR while INTC stands at 2.68%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-22.22%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
45.03%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-13.19%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-43.98%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-91.64%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-93.70%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-96.39%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
72.90%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 88.55%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
3.59%
Below 50% of INTC's 19.24%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
1.88%
Below 50% of INTC's 19.48%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
435.74%
Below 50% of INTC's 1286.96%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
417.97%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 249.72%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
265.17%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 39.88%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
23.22%
AR growth well above INTC's 21.85%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-20.15%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-3.38%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-0.78%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.44%
Our R&D shrinks while INTC invests at 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-15.75%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.