PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
17.79%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 12.30%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
39.45%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x INTC's 25.08%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
272.17%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
3330.00%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
1429.41%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
2000.00%
Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1900.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.63%
Share reduction while INTC is at 0.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.39%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.80%
Dividend reduction while INTC stands at 0.25%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
121.91%
OCF growth under 50% of INTC's 795.24%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
144.71%
FCF growth under 50% of INTC's 312.47%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
29.78%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 40.74%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
5.55%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 14.91%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-18.54%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC stands at 3.88%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
128.04%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 177.67%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
53.26%
Positive OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
6.84%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 129.02%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-0.33%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-17.92%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-86.65%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
73.41%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with INTC's 81.38%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
3.13%
Below 50% of INTC's 16.62%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-11.69%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while INTC is at 16.35%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
417.19%
10Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 827.63%. Martin Whitman suspects the firm lags in returning cash to shareholders over the decade.
423.04%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 250.26%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
262.50%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 39.67%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
10.58%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-3.19%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-0.09%
Negative asset growth while INTC invests at 1.32%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.66%
Positive BV/share change while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.40%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
7.21%
SG&A declining or stable vs. INTC's 124.75%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.