PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.34%
Revenue growth under 50% of INTC's 12.57%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
7.29%
Gross profit growth under 50% of INTC's 26.57%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
14.75%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
14.68%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
21.75%
Net income growth comparable to INTC's 22.95%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
23.26%
EPS growth similar to INTC's 23.53%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
23.81%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 21.21%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
-1.04%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.63%
Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 0.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
9.10%
Dividend growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.63%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
20.02%
Positive OCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-7.07%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
54.53%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to INTC's 55.52%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
32.29%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 25.49%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
2.56%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 13.76%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
42.74%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 20.13%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
6.47%
Positive OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
40.02%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
99.29%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 30.81% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
85.55%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 22.49%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
15.90%
Below 50% of INTC's 58.64%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
45.75%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 54.89%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
3.31%
Below 50% of INTC's 23.19%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
1.15%
Below 50% of INTC's 18.40%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
508.03%
10Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 835.27%. Martin Whitman suspects the firm lags in returning cash to shareholders over the decade.
370.06%
5Y dividend/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 250.01%. Bruce Berkowitz verifies that high dividend hikes remain sustainable, not a sign of over-distribution.
203.64%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 40.21%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-11.01%
Firm’s AR is declining while INTC shows 12.25%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
7.71%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. INTC's 17.87%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
1.81%
Asset growth well under 50% of INTC's 4.12%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
4.09%
50-75% of INTC's 7.09%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.80%
Our R&D shrinks while INTC invests at 12.10%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
2.35%
SG&A declining or stable vs. INTC's 105.91%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.