PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.66%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
6.29%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
8.23%
EBIT growth below 50% of INTC's 38.09%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
8.57%
Operating income growth under 50% of INTC's 38.09%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
0.46%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 7.01%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.72%
Share reduction while INTC is at 0.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.11%
Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 0.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.73%
Dividend growth under 50% of INTC's 12.30%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
-29.07%
Negative OCF growth while INTC is at 19.79%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-13.10%
Negative FCF growth while INTC is at 35.59%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
53.66%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to INTC's 55.72%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
48.77%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 22.63%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
17.46%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 21.57%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
133.79%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 50.25%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
87.28%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 22.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
49.88%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 174.61%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
106.89%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 9.47% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
120.86%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 25.95%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
49.13%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of INTC's 55.96%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
15.89%
Below 50% of INTC's 43.61%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
13.63%
Below 50% of INTC's 27.79%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
1.63%
Below 50% of INTC's 19.45%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
463.52%
Below 50% of INTC's 951.43%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
378.03%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 96.64%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
200.44%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 39.85%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
19.50%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
6.16%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 1.74%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
2.07%
Asset growth well under 50% of INTC's 5.04%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.59%
50-75% of INTC's 2.77%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.52%
We increase R&D while INTC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
3.16%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.