PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.08%
Revenue growth above 1.5x INTC's 4.52%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
12.14%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 10.81%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
15.73%
EBIT growth similar to INTC's 15.46%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
16.53%
Operating income growth similar to INTC's 15.46%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
16.87%
Net income growth comparable to INTC's 18.22%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
18.87%
EPS growth similar to INTC's 18.18%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
19.23%
Similar diluted EPS growth to INTC's 18.60%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
-2.03%
Share reduction while INTC is at 0.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-2.01%
Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 0.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.70%
Dividend growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.19%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
-20.85%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-43.18%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
74.35%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 56.44%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
45.91%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 28.80%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
21.46%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 29.51%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
24.50%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 33.23%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
-8.14%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is at 29.55%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-25.55%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC stands at 50.61%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-15.87%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is at 11.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
65.53%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 56.45%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
49.96%
Below 50% of INTC's 135.89%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
9.16%
Below 50% of INTC's 50.99%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
15.04%
Below 50% of INTC's 34.60%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
0.96%
Below 50% of INTC's 20.58%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
513.01%
10Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 957.82%. Martin Whitman suspects the firm lags in returning cash to shareholders over the decade.
384.68%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 96.47%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
52.06%
3Y dividend/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 40.46%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the company's short-term profits or payout policy justify these higher hikes.
12.39%
AR growth well above INTC's 10.86%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
5.72%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. INTC's 12.02%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-1.67%
Negative asset growth while INTC invests at 3.44%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
1.55%
Under 50% of INTC's 6.20%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.95%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 6.52%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
5.29%
SG&A growth well above INTC's 4.62%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.