PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.98%
Revenue growth above 1.5x INTC's 3.13%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
7.66%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x INTC's 1.19%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
11.16%
EBIT growth above 1.5x INTC's 3.89%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
10.84%
Operating income growth above 1.5x INTC's 3.89%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
11.70%
Net income growth above 1.5x INTC's 2.36%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
12.70%
EPS growth above 1.5x INTC's 1.92%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
14.52%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x INTC's 1.96%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-1.99%
Share reduction while INTC is at 0.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-2.05%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.75%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
134.52%
OCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 2.61%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
230.47%
Positive FCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
72.02%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 53.25%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
42.89%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 21.20%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
22.19%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 15.20%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
292.55%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 43.13%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
19.41%
Positive OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
3.03%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
83.88%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 41.94% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
86.72%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 61.06%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
32.48%
Below 50% of INTC's 72.75%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
16.38%
Below 50% of INTC's 52.46%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
15.09%
Below 50% of INTC's 41.41%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
7.05%
Below 50% of INTC's 22.09%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
493.84%
10Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 682.93%. Martin Whitman suspects the firm lags in returning cash to shareholders over the decade.
784467.57%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 96.22%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
50.12%
3Y dividend/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 39.76%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the company's short-term profits or payout policy justify these higher hikes.
2.27%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. INTC's 19.79%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
5.56%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 2.33%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
3.99%
Asset growth at 75-90% of INTC's 5.02%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
4.19%
Similar to INTC's 3.82%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.38%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 0.54%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
3.44%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.