PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.75%
Negative revenue growth while INTC stands at 3.20%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-8.29%
Negative gross profit growth while INTC is at 1.16%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-0.24%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
0.24%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
9.66%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 7.61%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
11.27%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 7.55%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
8.45%
Similar diluted EPS growth to INTC's 7.69%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
-1.01%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.59%
Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 0.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
8.09%
Dividend growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.64%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
-6.68%
Negative OCF growth while INTC is at 55.16%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
0.76%
FCF growth under 50% of INTC's 66.19%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
72.41%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 59.57%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
34.31%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 21.52%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
16.04%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 12.50%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
177.75%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 99.12%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
85.39%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 61.03%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
1.19%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 22.34%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
120.11%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 75.74% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
96.83%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 40.26%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
46.06%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to INTC's 47.29%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
22.64%
Below 50% of INTC's 60.51%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
19.66%
Below 50% of INTC's 47.81%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
22.49%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to INTC's 21.59%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
511.63%
10Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 689.12%. Martin Whitman suspects the firm lags in returning cash to shareholders over the decade.
336.24%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 97.31%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
29.79%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 40.30%. Martin Whitman might see a weaker short-term approach to distributing cash.
-13.45%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
6.74%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 9.76%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
5.95%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 4.29%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
5.84%
1.25-1.5x INTC's 4.06%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.00%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-0.26%
We cut SG&A while INTC invests at 13.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.