PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.77%
Negative revenue growth while INTC stands at 12.13%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-7.59%
Negative gross profit growth while INTC is at 6.47%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-25.49%
Negative EBIT growth while INTC is at 3.36%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-26.18%
Negative operating income growth while INTC is at 3.36%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-29.30%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-29.11%
Negative EPS growth while INTC is at 1.75%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-28.57%
Negative diluted EPS growth while INTC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.43%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
0.42%
Slight or no buyback while INTC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
0.43%
Dividend growth under 50% of INTC's 15.16%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
-58.05%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-65.34%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
103.42%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 137.19%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
38.18%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 54.30%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
17.88%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 40.97%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
557.38%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 318.89%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
25.82%
Below 50% of INTC's 105.58%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-8.46%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC stands at 92.31%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
339.00%
Below 50% of INTC's 703.20%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
54.62%
Below 50% of INTC's 150.04%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
14.40%
Below 50% of INTC's 132.44%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
23.29%
Below 50% of INTC's 58.11%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
27.79%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 47.97%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
21.98%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to INTC's 23.61%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
526.91%
10Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 814.45%. Martin Whitman suspects the firm lags in returning cash to shareholders over the decade.
332.92%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 82.44%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
30.81%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 42.77%. Martin Whitman might see a weaker short-term approach to distributing cash.
3.29%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. INTC's 23.54%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
10.39%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 9.10%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-0.68%
Negative asset growth while INTC invests at 3.74%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
1.75%
Positive BV/share change while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.65%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 14.66%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
1.54%
SG&A declining or stable vs. INTC's 4.11%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.