PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.95%
Revenue growth under 50% of INTC's 101.44%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
1.45%
Gross profit growth under 50% of INTC's 100.22%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-0.33%
Negative EBIT growth while INTC is at 94.64%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-0.33%
Negative operating income growth while INTC is at 94.64%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
0.90%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 93.48%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
1.79%
EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 96.55%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
1.82%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 98.21%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.94%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.17%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-1.03%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
22.29%
Positive OCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
10.25%
FCF growth 50-75% of INTC's 15.27%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
163.00%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 411.10%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
25.66%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 248.67%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
17.83%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 189.69%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
66.82%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 134.42%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
32.66%
Below 50% of INTC's 179.70%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
38.83%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 48.85%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.
628.47%
Below 50% of INTC's 3802.14%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-62.18%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is 645.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
30.50%
Below 50% of INTC's 304.83%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
33.35%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 65.90%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
14.54%
Below 50% of INTC's 51.09%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
24.70%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 27.97%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
528.07%
10Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 790.48%. Martin Whitman suspects the firm lags in returning cash to shareholders over the decade.
328.75%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 78.17%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
29.76%
3Y dividend/share CAGR similar to INTC's 27.34%. Walter Schloss finds parallel short-term dividend strategies for both companies.
6.63%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
5.01%
We show growth while INTC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
28.46%
Asset growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.82%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
4.09%
Similar to INTC's 4.36%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.47%
R&D dropping or stable vs. INTC's 103.65%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
3.79%
SG&A declining or stable vs. INTC's 107.32%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.