PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.23%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-0.51%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-13.11%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-10.06%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-10.57%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-8.77%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-8.93%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-1.04%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.95%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.30%
Dividend reduction while INTC stands at 18.69%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
80.35%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 59.88%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
166.20%
FCF growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 144.52%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capex decisions or cost controls create a cash flow advantage.
173.88%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to INTC's 181.27%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
21.32%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 80.90%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
16.64%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 50.28%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
397.80%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 298.83%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
257.54%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 152.75%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
23.30%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 108.36%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
850.50%
Below 50% of INTC's 4131.66%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
12.70%
Below 50% of INTC's 196.07%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
21.68%
Below 50% of INTC's 85.75%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
39.50%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 66.14%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
20.69%
Below 50% of INTC's 46.28%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
24.51%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 27.85%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
484.42%
10Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 955.81%. Martin Whitman suspects the firm lags in returning cash to shareholders over the decade.
323.55%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 112.13%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
28.78%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 51.82%. Martin Whitman might see a weaker short-term approach to distributing cash.
6.70%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. INTC's 13.75%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
11.52%
We show growth while INTC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
22.28%
Asset growth above 1.5x INTC's 6.75%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
2.19%
Positive BV/share change while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
65.84%
Debt shrinking faster vs. INTC's 230.50%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
-6.84%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-5.60%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.