PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.33%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-11.24%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-53.58%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-55.16%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-50.42%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-50.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-49.02%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.70%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.35%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
31.32%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while INTC cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-14.67%
Negative OCF growth while INTC is at 4.43%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-13.44%
Negative FCF growth while INTC is at 4.13%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
169.55%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to INTC's 168.61%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
27.62%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 62.77%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
54.82%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 85.16%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
75.33%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 171.78%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
48.49%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 79.27%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
-2.06%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC stands at 180.11%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
461.83%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 800.45%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
-42.35%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is 154.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
214.05%
Below 50% of INTC's 1474.87%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
29.85%
Below 50% of INTC's 73.07%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
24.58%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 41.94%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
32.42%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 28.82%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
655.09%
10Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 978.53%. Martin Whitman suspects the firm lags in returning cash to shareholders over the decade.
330.01%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 111.07%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
54.35%
3Y dividend/share CAGR similar to INTC's 50.84%. Walter Schloss finds parallel short-term dividend strategies for both companies.
-13.40%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-9.01%
Inventory is declining while INTC stands at 3.46%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-1.96%
Negative asset growth while INTC invests at 0.81%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.03%
Under 50% of INTC's 1.93%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-3.60%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 2.65%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
20.00%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 7.85%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
14.43%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.