PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-8.74%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-1.10%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
3.79%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
8.77%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-11.07%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-11.54%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-15.38%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.62%
Slight or no buybacks while INTC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
1.04%
Slight or no buyback while INTC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
0.42%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while INTC cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-53.76%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-57.70%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
183.96%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 154.48%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
23.39%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 68.49%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
66.90%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 101.37%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
152.15%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with INTC's 160.06%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
2.25%
Below 50% of INTC's 121.30%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
99.54%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 776.52%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
1259.23%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 291.12% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-35.21%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is 93.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
1638.85%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 371.78%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
55.33%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 74.35%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
23.79%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 44.00%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
34.09%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to INTC's 33.38%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
776.07%
10Y dividend/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 946.70%. Bill Ackman might push for a stronger payout policy to match the competitor’s returns.
324.16%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 86.50%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
54.27%
3Y dividend/share CAGR similar to INTC's 50.12%. Walter Schloss finds parallel short-term dividend strategies for both companies.
-4.34%
Firm’s AR is declining while INTC shows 128.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
3.64%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. INTC's 9.59%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-2.38%
Negative asset growth while INTC invests at 0.98%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.47%
Under 50% of INTC's 3.36%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-5.49%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 1.62%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
7.38%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 4.03%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
4.05%
SG&A growth of 4.05% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.