Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)

Negative revenue growth while INTC stands at 0.15%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.

Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.

Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.

Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.

Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.

Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.

Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.

Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.

Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.

Negative OCF growth while INTC is at 17.08%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.

Negative FCF growth while INTC is at 93.04%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.

10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 149.95%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.

5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 47.90%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.

3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 41.79%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.

10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 127.26%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.

Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is at 48.44%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.

3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 96.78%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.

Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 212.42%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.

Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is 27.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.

Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC is 20.25%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.

10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 91.70%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.

5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 40.76%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.

3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 36.52%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.

10Y dividend/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 1025.70%. Bill Ackman might push for a stronger payout policy to match the competitor’s returns.

Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.

Negative asset growth while INTC invests at 13.31%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.

We have a declining book value while INTC shows 4.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.

Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.