PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.16%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-4.91%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
133.15%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
184.17%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
37.12%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
39.13%
Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
39.13%
Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.54%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.09%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.74%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-66.82%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-72.09%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
98.72%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 146.90%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
5.70%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 52.10%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
0.26%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 36.49%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
177.32%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 232.02%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
-32.68%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is at 126.26%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-43.52%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC stands at 17.39%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
367.16%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 196.13% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-34.45%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is 65.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-38.72%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
54.13%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 91.61%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
33.19%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 47.26%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
24.41%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 33.35%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
846.73%
10Y dividend/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 1026.74%. Bill Ackman might push for a stronger payout policy to match the competitor’s returns.
109.10%
5Y dividend/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 76.30%. Bruce Berkowitz verifies that high dividend hikes remain sustainable, not a sign of over-distribution.
73.43%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 43.08%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
8.37%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-3.24%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-1.81%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.46%
1.25-1.5x INTC's 0.39%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
-0.05%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-1.41%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
6.74%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.