PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.62%
Revenue growth above 1.5x INTC's 1.84%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
14.26%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x INTC's 5.72%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
51.57%
EBIT growth above 1.5x INTC's 7.94%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
129.37%
Operating income growth above 1.5x INTC's 7.94%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
82.32%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
84.37%
Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
81.25%
Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.36%
Share reduction while INTC is at 0.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.53%
Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 0.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
33.67%
Dividend growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.20%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
87.22%
OCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 10.20%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
109.06%
Positive FCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
104.15%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 146.37%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
8.82%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 54.87%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-4.55%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC stands at 32.99%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
179.43%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 133.65%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
55.41%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 91.16%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
31.35%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 51.37%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
754.81%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 192.58% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
34.33%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 43.02%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
-6.00%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
58.52%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 98.85%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
32.67%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 52.72%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
24.26%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 31.25%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
1208.79%
10Y dividend/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 1023.66%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if a higher payout growth rate remains sustainable long term.
180.15%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 60.71%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
130.21%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 43.10%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
11.85%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
1.18%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. INTC's 4.22%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-1.54%
Negative asset growth while INTC invests at 3.10%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
1.43%
Under 50% of INTC's 4.53%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-9.11%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 1.38%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-7.16%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
2.61%
SG&A declining or stable vs. INTC's 11.20%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.