PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.66%
Negative revenue growth while INTC stands at 2.60%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-7.81%
Negative gross profit growth while INTC is at 1.87%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-18.38%
Negative EBIT growth while INTC is at 1.28%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-18.60%
Negative operating income growth while INTC is at 1.28%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-18.76%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-17.86%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-17.86%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.91%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.81%
Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 0.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
6.82%
Dividend growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.20%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
4.17%
OCF growth at 75-90% of INTC's 5.36%. Bill Ackman would demand better working capital management or cost discipline.
6.33%
FCF growth 75-90% of INTC's 7.93%. Bill Ackman might push for improved capital allocation or operational changes to match the competitor.
160.86%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 107.33%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
43.38%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 88.24%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-7.30%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC stands at 34.86%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
168.15%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 99.34%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
26.50%
Below 50% of INTC's 160.33%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
5.20%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 21.51%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
137.70%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 58.25% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
463.32%
Below 50% of INTC's 1155.62%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-41.46%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
117.37%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 101.65%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
36.69%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 66.82%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
11.74%
Below 50% of INTC's 31.63%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
2060.94%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 1021.00%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
172.72%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 61.28%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
129.94%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 42.44%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-21.06%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
0.29%
We show growth while INTC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-1.59%
Negative asset growth while INTC invests at 2.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-1.31%
We have a declining book value while INTC shows 5.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-0.06%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-5.98%
Our R&D shrinks while INTC invests at 3.06%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-0.86%
We cut SG&A while INTC invests at 1.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.