PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.49%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-2.01%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-1.42%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
0.44%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-4.70%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-4.35%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-4.35%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.46%
Share reduction while INTC is at 0.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.54%
Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 0.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.15%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while INTC cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-61.47%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-64.74%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
62.88%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 105.52%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
68.66%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 100.16%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
-5.06%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC stands at 8.90%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
88.46%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 157.83%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
117.10%
Below 50% of INTC's 937.73%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-3.34%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
112.73%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 46.62% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
3278.82%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 237.17%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-21.06%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
40.88%
Below 50% of INTC's 98.46%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
36.00%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 66.44%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
8.43%
Below 50% of INTC's 34.39%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
1308.17%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 462.86%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
171.86%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 60.94%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
129.32%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 23.39%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
12.64%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-0.98%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-0.02%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-1.28%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
9.58%
We have some new debt while INTC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
5.78%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 0.71%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
3.90%
SG&A growth well above INTC's 1.55%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.