PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.36%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 8.36%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
17.05%
Gross profit growth similar to INTC's 16.93%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
41.52%
EBIT growth 75-90% of INTC's 51.76%. Bill Ackman would push for cost reforms or better product mix to narrow the gap.
42.32%
Operating income growth at 75-90% of INTC's 51.76%. Bill Ackman would demand a plan to enhance operating leverage.
40.25%
Net income growth comparable to INTC's 43.61%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
43.18%
EPS growth similar to INTC's 43.59%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
40.91%
Similar diluted EPS growth to INTC's 44.74%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
-0.93%
Share reduction while INTC is at 0.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.91%
Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 0.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.31%
Dividend growth at 50-75% of INTC's 0.48%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in returning cash to shareholders.
67.75%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 55.76%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
80.52%
FCF growth under 50% of INTC's 223.28%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
67.30%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 122.48%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
58.50%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 93.62%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
2.76%
Positive 3Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
152.27%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 73.68%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
64.60%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 81.00%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
32.57%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 48.21%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
155.09%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 106.04%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
210.77%
Below 50% of INTC's 889.11%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
9.70%
Positive short-term CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
38.59%
Below 50% of INTC's 98.76%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
34.39%
Below 50% of INTC's 70.44%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
3.61%
Below 50% of INTC's 31.24%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
1337.84%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 465.06%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
174.90%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 61.33%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
132.42%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 26.46%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
12.69%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
1.75%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. INTC's 4.78%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-5.94%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-0.53%
We have a declining book value while INTC shows 1.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-17.76%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-4.64%
Our R&D shrinks while INTC invests at 0.46%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-1.46%
We cut SG&A while INTC invests at 1.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.