PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.35%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 5.23%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
8.67%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 6.07%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
19.59%
EBIT growth similar to INTC's 18.11%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
19.65%
Operating income growth similar to INTC's 18.11%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
20.94%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 18.63%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
22.22%
EPS growth similar to INTC's 21.43%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
22.58%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 20.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
-1.03%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.10%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.21%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
78.45%
OCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 4.40%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
84.17%
FCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 23.73%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
75.81%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 124.44%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
43.93%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 75.88%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
9.01%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to INTC's 8.83%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
139.61%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with INTC's 134.61%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
96.33%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 61.37%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
31.16%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
139.45%
Similar net income/share CAGR to INTC's 127.34%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
81.78%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 102.78%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
48.33%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 1.80%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
32.52%
Below 50% of INTC's 94.91%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
31.35%
Below 50% of INTC's 65.66%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
2.49%
Below 50% of INTC's 31.52%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
1346.20%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 465.40%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
173.68%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 61.14%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
132.62%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 5.76%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-3.27%
Firm’s AR is declining while INTC shows 4.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
0.40%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. INTC's 4.36%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
0.51%
Positive asset growth while INTC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.09%
Positive BV/share change while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-0.06%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 0.55%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-4.87%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-1.91%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.