PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.64%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-4.17%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-13.26%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-12.91%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-20.48%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-19.48%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-19.74%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.21%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.19%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.21%
Dividend growth under 50% of INTC's 6.99%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
-52.12%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-57.63%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
72.62%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to INTC's 77.48%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
16.03%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 44.73%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
10.46%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 4.42%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
89.65%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 53.99%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
1.26%
Below 50% of INTC's 26.23%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
48.44%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 56.64%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.
159.95%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 19.82% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
17.70%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
170.91%
Positive short-term CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
41.87%
Below 50% of INTC's 90.80%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
24.85%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 49.31%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
2.50%
Below 50% of INTC's 23.85%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
1248.38%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 199.71%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
182.07%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 52.41%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
99.80%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 14.29%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
11.88%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
3.36%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 3.39%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-2.12%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.01%
Positive BV/share change while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-0.09%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
8.68%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 0.17%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
2.33%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.