PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.60%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of INTC's 3.24%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
3.58%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of INTC's 6.70%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
5.30%
EBIT growth below 50% of INTC's 10.75%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
5.43%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of INTC's 10.75%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
6.10%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 35.84%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
6.45%
EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 35.71%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
6.56%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 34.15%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.99%
Share reduction while INTC is at 0.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.94%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.43%
Similar dividend growth to INTC's 0.41%. Walter Schloss might see parallel free cash flow or payout philosophies.
34.65%
Positive OCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
43.00%
Positive FCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
57.57%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 84.54%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
7.99%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 43.28%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
6.84%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 3.13%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
56.58%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 49.43%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
70.44%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 15.35%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
33.92%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
75.01%
Similar net income/share CAGR to INTC's 71.42%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
5.73%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 9.57%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
72.03%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 1.01%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
40.58%
Below 50% of INTC's 98.03%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
22.21%
Below 50% of INTC's 47.12%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
0.82%
Below 50% of INTC's 24.81%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
1263.46%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 200.10%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
181.31%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 52.75%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
100.13%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 14.41%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
2.87%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. INTC's 18.92%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
2.22%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. INTC's 9.05%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
1.07%
Similar asset growth to INTC's 1.03%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
-0.60%
We have a declining book value while INTC shows 4.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
5.30%
Debt growth far above INTC's 0.01%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-5.33%
Our R&D shrinks while INTC invests at 3.07%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
7.06%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.