PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.10%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of INTC's 9.62%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
6.17%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of INTC's 10.46%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
15.50%
EBIT growth below 50% of INTC's 44.75%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
15.25%
Operating income growth under 50% of INTC's 44.75%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
14.66%
Net income growth comparable to INTC's 14.89%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
16.67%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 14.04%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
16.92%
Similar diluted EPS growth to INTC's 16.36%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
-1.40%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.52%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.30%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
71.83%
Similar OCF growth to INTC's 66.72%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
82.73%
FCF growth under 50% of INTC's 170.71%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
52.13%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 85.46%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
6.46%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 53.02%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
12.10%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to INTC's 13.13%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
48.23%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 67.74%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
24.14%
Below 50% of INTC's 88.30%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
29.91%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 17.27%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
101.43%
Similar net income/share CAGR to INTC's 99.01%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
7.87%
Below 50% of INTC's 23.56%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
12.80%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 10.10%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
33.75%
Below 50% of INTC's 98.81%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
16.21%
Below 50% of INTC's 40.59%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-3.10%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while INTC is at 21.97%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
2216987.49%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 199.55%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
182.59%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 52.66%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
98.80%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 6.65%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
3.28%
AR growth well above INTC's 6.24%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-6.05%
Inventory is declining while INTC stands at 3.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-5.66%
Negative asset growth while INTC invests at 8.91%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-0.92%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-15.40%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 60.10%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-1.25%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-7.66%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.