PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.00%
Negative revenue growth while INTC stands at 3.10%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-6.56%
Negative gross profit growth while INTC is at 5.26%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-0.77%
Negative EBIT growth while INTC is at 2.55%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-1.89%
Negative operating income growth while INTC is at 2.55%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
4.76%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 16.21%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
3.90%
EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 18.46%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
5.26%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 15.62%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.82%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.77%
Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
11.84%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while INTC cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
1.49%
Positive OCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-0.31%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
40.82%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 85.99%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
4.85%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 53.05%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
17.82%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to INTC's 16.43%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
149.80%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 85.14%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
34.74%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 14.97%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
45.06%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
102.44%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 87.37%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
2.85%
Below 50% of INTC's 33.59%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
248.52%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 54.02%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
32.16%
Below 50% of INTC's 114.77%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
10.44%
Below 50% of INTC's 45.30%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-0.13%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while INTC is at 25.51%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
1175.51%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 199.03%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
192.39%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 51.55%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
80.78%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 6.53%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-21.34%
Firm’s AR is declining while INTC shows 16.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-4.52%
Inventory is declining while INTC stands at 4.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-1.87%
Negative asset growth while INTC invests at 4.58%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.58%
Under 50% of INTC's 7.55%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-0.29%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 6.99%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-3.16%
Our R&D shrinks while INTC invests at 6.56%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-6.68%
We cut SG&A while INTC invests at 10.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.