PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.81%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
9.81%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
15.53%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
15.39%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
15.19%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
15.71%
Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
14.49%
Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.32%
Share reduction while INTC is at 0.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.20%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.06%
Dividend growth under 50% of INTC's 0.26%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
95.43%
Positive OCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
115.37%
Positive FCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
37.03%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 107.28%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
9.05%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
18.09%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 11.20%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
158.94%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 207.87%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
95.19%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 10.07%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
74.36%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-46.89%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is at 84.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
40.42%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
36.42%
Positive short-term CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
20.58%
Below 50% of INTC's 116.34%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
5.27%
Below 50% of INTC's 43.18%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-1.05%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while INTC is at 19.98%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
1158.01%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 159.88%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
193.41%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 45.86%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
35.90%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 15.58%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
6.23%
AR growth well above INTC's 4.98%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
3.93%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 0.85%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
0.04%
Asset growth well under 50% of INTC's 4.14%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.17%
BV/share growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.17%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-12.29%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 12.79%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
5.90%
We increase R&D while INTC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
2.95%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.