205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
12.28%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of INTC's 16.59%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
13.83%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of INTC's 25.21%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
24.58%
EBIT growth below 50% of INTC's 238.54%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
24.89%
Operating income growth under 50% of INTC's 238.54%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
18.19%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 153.98%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
23.46%
EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 153.57%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
24.05%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 155.56%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.22%
Share reduction while INTC is at 0.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
0.10%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x INTC's 0.23%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
0.22%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while INTC cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
32.18%
OCF growth at 50-75% of INTC's 49.75%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
39.85%
FCF growth under 50% of INTC's 111.35%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
46.99%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 120.02%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
21.16%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to INTC's 21.63%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
24.02%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to INTC's 23.13%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
407.30%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 151.50%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
41.89%
Positive OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
34.40%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 5.71%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
107.43%
Below 50% of INTC's 216.41%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
84.05%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 6.87%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
68.48%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 20.48%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
28.66%
Below 50% of INTC's 119.65%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
6.60%
Below 50% of INTC's 50.16%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
1.90%
Below 50% of INTC's 19.76%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
1149.23%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 159.99%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
194.94%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 22.56%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
35.78%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 15.54%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
7.34%
AR growth well above INTC's 11.88%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-3.62%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
3.33%
Asset growth above 1.5x INTC's 2.17%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
3.48%
1.25-1.5x INTC's 2.74%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
-0.03%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
3.52%
We increase R&D while INTC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-2.64%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.