PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.35%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
0.52%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-16.03%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-5.08%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-4.78%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-4.81%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-4.90%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.20%
Slight or no buybacks while INTC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.10%
Diluted share change of 0.10% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-0.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-42.68%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-47.69%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
54.04%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 104.45%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
24.84%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 21.34%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
23.53%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to INTC's 22.08%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
107.34%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 207.21%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
102.79%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 38.82%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
86.39%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 17.26%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
179.18%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 121.60%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
330.89%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 14.58%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
121.75%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 60.32%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
36.24%
Below 50% of INTC's 117.88%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
10.06%
Below 50% of INTC's 51.30%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
8.51%
Below 50% of INTC's 21.26%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
1145.59%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 131.27%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
193.66%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 24.01%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
66.64%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 15.67%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
5.52%
AR growth well above INTC's 4.93%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
2.96%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 4.47%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-2.76%
Negative asset growth while INTC invests at 2.05%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
1.38%
1.25-1.5x INTC's 1.19%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
-6.95%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 1.85%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
7.58%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 1.40%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
6.81%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.