205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.55%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
10.73%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
18.30%
EBIT growth above 1.5x INTC's 6.34%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
18.21%
Operating income growth above 1.5x INTC's 6.34%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
5.92%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
6.06%
Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
6.19%
Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.40%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.39%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.00%
Dividend growth under 50% of INTC's 5.01%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
15.35%
OCF growth at 50-75% of INTC's 20.75%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
14.67%
FCF growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 11.63%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capex decisions or cost controls create a cash flow advantage.
55.93%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 109.77%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
27.00%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 16.59%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
20.87%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 12.88%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
47.63%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 140.19%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
55.81%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 5.90%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
27.49%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
150.27%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 170.99%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
171.55%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 5.91%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
66.59%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 6.21%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
34.68%
Below 50% of INTC's 113.20%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
10.06%
Below 50% of INTC's 50.00%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
10.24%
Below 50% of INTC's 22.49%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
526.04%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 143.45%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
192.90%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 29.83%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
66.12%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 20.87%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
9.87%
AR growth well above INTC's 9.67%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
5.64%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 9.02%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
2.88%
Asset growth at 50-75% of INTC's 5.59%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
1.05%
Under 50% of INTC's 2.95%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
6.70%
Debt shrinking faster vs. INTC's 24.21%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
2.44%
We increase R&D while INTC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-1.14%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.